We do not live on a flat earth. We do not
live in a static 3-dimensional universe. Dimension is determined
by the rate at which time passes. Space grows and shrinks as the
passing rate of time slows and increases.
Did you ever wonder why we have such a hard
time getting clocks to agree? It is not a mechanical problem. If
the passing rate of time changes.... then time itself will change.
Did you ever wonder why scientist can't
get their measurements exactly right? They always speak
in degrees of accuracy. Well, if the passing rate of time changes,
then the size of rulers change, measurements change.
TIME and MEASUREMENT
Do you think the two might be related?
What is the Pauli Exclusion Principle?
You can't determine the exact speed of an
object and determine it's exact position at the same time. The closer
the accuracy you get on its position, the less accuracy you have
on its speed.. and vice versa.
Well, no wonder. If the size of space depends
on the rate at which time passes- then how can you use your ruler
to determine exactly where something is that is speeding and is
in a different passing rate of time? Its universe is a different
size. You can determine its speed relative to your persepctive.
You can determine its location relative to your perspective. You
can't determine both at the same time because you are in a different
Now let us consider the size of space. If
the size of space changes what effects could this have?
Well first we can consider gravity and understand
that when the underlying size of space is changing at an increasing
rate... it is causing anything entering that space to speed up.
A changing spacial landscape causes motion.
Let us equate this idea of the passing rate
of time to Time Density.
We consider Galileo's Thermometer.
Here is a case where spheres will move in
response to the density or volume of water. As water warms, it expands
or increases its size. Glass spheres in the water remain virtually
unchanged. When the weight per unit volume of a sphere is greater
than that of the surrounding water, the sphere falls to the bottom.
When the weight per unit volume of a sphere is less that that of
the surrounding water, the sphere rises.
This is a case of differing densities causing
MOTION. We could even consider spheres moving in a downward direction
as positive or attracted to the bottom. We could consider a sphere
moving in an upward direction as being negative and repulsed by
the bottom. Of course in reality we know it has nothing to do with
attraction or repulsion. It has everything to do with Density.
Equate this with Time Density. Time Density
causing motion in the same way.
But you say- in our world we only see attraction.
Gravity is only an attractive force.
True. But in the world of electricity and
magnetism isn't it possible that it is Time Density appearing as
a negative or positive force?
Magnetism defined in a new way- A material
which changes the structure of space. Metals defined in a new way-
A material which responds to this structure.
Why only metals? Why not other materials?
Perhaps it has to do with degree. After all... a rowboat only responds
to waves close to its own length. It may do a slow almost indescernable
motion in response to a huge wave and ignore small, choppy waves.
Only when the waves are near to the size of the boat does it rock
furiously. Those of you who laugh at this and believe only in the
attraction of electrons and the filling of shells... note the following:
A fact about electrons: They only respond
to electromagnetic radiation at certain wavelengths. Is electromagnetic
radiation a ripple in the Time Density field?
It is interesting how close the formulas
for eletricity and gravity are:
By substituting masses
for electrical charges and by using a different universal constant
we have Newton’s equation for a gravitational field.
I believe that the size of space is constantly
being changed by attempting to equalize Time Densities. As Einstein
stated- Matter warps space and space tells matter how to move. This
equalization process appears as motion and the changing landscape
Einstein wanted to verify that a large mass
(the sun) warps space in its vicinity causing the light from distant
stars to veer in its path. Light always takes the path of least
time, not the path of least distance. Interesting that we believe
the shortest path equals a straight line and is the shortest time.
Not so for light. Light will take a curved path in the vicinity
of the sun, a curved path which is faster than a straight line.
When stars were photographed during an eclipse they appeared to
be in a different location in the sky. Of course we know stars do
not change position. It was the path that light took making them
appear to jump and thus proving Einstein correct.
Most people believe that Einstein's theory
affects only huge astronomical distances at near light speeds. They
only see the warping of space near a huge body like the sun.
Einstein believed this also. Otherwise he
would not have waited years for scientists to test his theory under
just the right conditions of an eclipse.
But we do not need to use light and astonomical
distances to prove that gravity warps space. We can use two pennies
in place of light and we can use the catenary curve right in our
own living room to prove that gravity warps space.
In a gravitational field the shortest distance
between two points is NEVER a straight line. A curve which follows
a path of greater speed then a straight line is a catenary. Because
it follows a path of greater speed, it is a shorter distance. This
is due to the fact that True Distance is determined by the passing
rate of time. Since the catenary in a gravitational field forces
an object to travel through a landscape that includes a more squeezed,
smaller space (the passsage of time slowing down more), the penny
traveling the catenary curve will reach the bottom before
the penny traveling the straight line. In otherwards, the catenary
penny is faster and there is additional useful energy in that curve.
You do not need a large body like the sun
to prove curvature of space. You only need two pennys in your own
living room and a catenary curve.
This is the 'SECRET' of so called free energy.
It isn't really free. It is just an aspect of our multi-dimensional
universe that those who believe in a 3-dimensional universe do not
All curved paths require less energy due
to the fact that the shortest distance between 2 points in a gravitational
field is a curvature.. not a straight line.
Viktor Schauberger was using this principle
(although he did so because he was copying nature) when he created
his trout turbine. The machine was constructed so that a conical-shaped
object was set in motion within a vacuum-sealed container. A system
of Schauberger's special pipes was wound around the cone-shaped
object, that tapered downwards. Water entered from above and could
flow through the pipes when the cone-shaped object was rotated by
a small motor. Due to the pipes shape and spiral course, the water
was 'screwed' towards the center of the pipe and sprayed out through
outlets in the lower parts of the pipe, at a tremendous velocity
and under great pressure. This was directed onto a turbine wheel,
which powered a generator.
The special feature of this apparatus was
the amplification of the input energy, and the fact that the water,
as it poured out of the outlets, rose to the top of the system,
to be recirculated. Schauberger claimed that the water rose because
it was so strongly charged with biological magnetism or negative
I have two observations:
1. An excess of energy is created by water
traveling a spiral path as opposed to a straight path.
2. A cone shaped object when it is rotated
is shrinking distance in the direction of its rotation. This is
because the passing rate of time which is slowing due to the speed
of rotation will shrink space causing water to require even less
energy to travel that path. The 90 degree angle of the path of the
returning water can use that extra energy gain to push it along
the straight line path... appearing to Schauberger to create biological
magnetism or negative gravity.
Where else do we see something like this?
The air in tornados.
The speed of air at the top of a tornado
is greater then the speed at the bottom. The circular cycloid path
that the air takes, requires less energy then the air traveling
in a straight line. In effect, it is just the opposite of earth's
spacial landscape. It creates a perfect 'anti-gravity' powerful
sucking action with this created energy. The passage of time slows
as it rises inside the Tornado, opposite to the passage of time
slowing as it approaches closer to the earth. This is an example
of negative gravity.
Schauberger during World War II supposedly
built several flying saucers for Hitler. He claimed if water or
air is rotated into a twisting form of oscillation known as 'colloidal',
a build up of energy results, which, with emmense power can cause
levitation. In a brief letter to West German defense minister Strauss
on the 28th of February 1956 he wrote:
'The first' flying saucer rose unexpectedly
at its first attempt; it rose to the ceiling and then was wrecked.
Supposedly there were more flying saucers.
See page 95 LIVING WATER, Viktor Schauberger and the Secrets of
We can believe in a static 3- dimensional
universe and say such things are rubbish, or we can take that step
of understanding into a multi-dimensional universe where such things
In a static 3-dimensional universe the distant
stars are out of reach. But in a multi-dimensional universe where
distance and the entire universe itself shrinks and expands with
the rate at which time passes - space travel is possible.